The Old Horseman's Blog.

Refuge of an old Rebel.


Why OWS Is Kinda' Sad...
Dark
[info]oldhorseman
.

-   People really do complicate the heck out of things when they're trying to justify what would be clearly wrong if you looked at it straight-on.  Especially in social-political theories.  Layer on enough BS and maybe nobody will see that you're arguing for theft and slavery of others for your own benefit.  Maybe you'll even convince yourself.

-   Folks these days have plenty to be genuinely pissed about.  And I think it's generally a good thing that they're finally starting to realize it.  But the direction so many are lashing-out in, and the 'solutions' they espouse, are kind of troubling.

-   The anti-capitalism aspect of the OWS kids at best suggests that they have a poor understanding of what capitalism actually is.  "Capital" is any resource which, if invested in a successful enterprise, produces a profit, part or all of which may be invested in additional enterprises for more profit.  With a bit of wisdom and luck, a person can accumulate considerable wealth this way.  There is also a natural potential for enterprises to fail, putting invested capital at risk. 

-   True capitalism is essentially the natural reality of the winner getting the prize.  It appeals to people who see themselves as potential winners.

-   Socialism/communism seems generous and humanitarian at first glance.  From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.  Egalitarian.
-   But, in reality, it's a system that punishes achievement and rewards failure.  It inherently appeals to people who see themselves as losers.

-   That's why it's sad to see this many kids spewing socialist mantras.  I'm horrified to think that they have so little faith in themselves that they want to embrace a system designed for those who have no hope of winning as individuals.


Somebody needs to go occupy a shower stall for a while...
Then maybe a milking stool or workshop or something!

-   (I can only hope that, like the original hippies, who preached Marxism in the '60s when it made them 'cool' with the in-crowd, but ultimately voted Reagan in twice when they weren't trying to impress other hippies, a lot of them are just 'along for the ride'... )

-   What we actually have today is technical fascism.  A diabolical system that twists aspects of both capitalism and socialism into a warped monstrosity that does indeed make it unreasonably difficult for most individuals to succeed.  That's something worth being angry about.

-   There are two sides to the coin of economic fascism...

-   Corporations and their banks are one.  Corporations are a legal fiction created to protect the flesh-and-blood people who own and run big businesses from being liable...  THINK ABOUT THAT FOR  A MINUTE.  Through corporations, some people can try to profit from capitalism, but are immune to the natural risks.  The corporation (a fictional entity) can run up huge debts, then collapse...  And the people who owned and ran the corporation aren't liable for those debts.  They don't lose the wealth they gained in salaries and dividends.  And they can turn right around and start over again with a new corporation.

-   The flip-side is the Government.  Using socialism as an excuse, the Government claims the power to take wealth from individuals by force, much of which they channel into corporations.  Further, the Government regulates corporations and industries, supposedly to protect the public from corporate power, but in reality to empower big corporations by throwing regulatory road-blocks in the path of upstart competition.  Also, just to rub salt in the wounds, the Government bails out failing corporations and banks with money taken from the public by force.

-   By the way, in the economic sense, fascism isn't about rounding up the Jews or goose-stepping in parades...  It's essentially Corporate Government.  The power elite running things through the intertwined fictional entities of the state and corporations.  The Government pretends to deserve authority in the name of socialism, while the corporations practice mock capitalism in a game fixed by the Government.


-   Socialism is not an answer.  Just an excuse for more fascist Government.  The only problem with real, free-market capitalism in America is that there's far too little of it. 

-   Truth is that fascism is too well entrenched to be defeated now.  No social/political action is going to bring about more than cosmetic card-shuffling.  (Although some of the OWS demands actually fit nicely with the probable plan to tighten US fascism for the contraction.)

-   On the opposite end of the spectrum, I don't think even the election of Ron Paul would have any real effect on the system.  He might be able to render the implosion a little less bloody, but it's too late to avoid it.

-   Soon the whole argument will be moot.  Either you'll be in the Fedghettos where GovCo power will be absolute, or outside where there'll be no entrenched structure with the means to enforce involuntary wealth redistribution beyond straight-up banditry.

-   That's my real interest in the whole political scene today...  A gauge of just what kind of people we have in America going into LATOC.  And it's pretty depressing when I see so many who think it's a wonderful idea to bleed the 'rich' to death to get more free stuff for themselves.  I imagine these same losers will feel it's 'unfair' when we've got clean water, milk, eggs, etc., while they're running out of supermarket loot.  Nevermind that we're only 'rich' because we worked like hell for decades and didn't blow the bulk of our resources on status-symbol gizmos, cars, and endless matriculation with no practical goal...  I only hope that most of the OWS types are early into the Fedghettos.  I'm not particularly looking forward to listening to swarms of buzzards over in the next valley.

-   The rising popularity of Ron Paul, on the other hand, is a bright note.  Even if he somehow manages to get elected (despite the fact that Fox News is trying to kill his candidacy), there's no way he can save the republic.  But people with a 'just get the government out of our way so we can find our own solutions' attitude are exactly who I want to have around in LATOC.


.


HOMESTRETCH: Loose the Reins and Swing the Whip...
Dark
[info]oldhorseman

   2012...  It is upon us.


   Will 12/21/12 be TEOTWAWKI?  Did the Mayans know something, or did they just get to the '12 solstice and say "Screw it. Good a place to stop as any." 

   Will it be another Y2k-like dud?

   Truth is, I've noticed that the big date predictions reliably fizzle.  So I won't be surprised if 12/21 is a total yawn.

   But I don't regret the changes we made in our life heading into Y2k...  When you look at all the "impossible" things that have happened since then, being increasingly divorced from the Cornucopian World has been a real blessing.

   So I'm going to continue to act as though 12/21/12 were date-certain for TEOTWAWKI, because it's too damned easy to procrastinate until it really is too late...  (Besides, if the Apocalypse doesn't happen on it's own by the end of '12, I might just have to start exterminating the lot of ye' myself!)

   That means we're in the final stretch.  A year really isn't much time.  Still have a lot to do.  Ammo to stockpile.  Landmines to lay.  Dry goods to put-up.  Amish tech to master.  Concubines to audition...

   So it's time to get with it.  No more "saving-up to do something in a few years".

   The time is now.  Ragnarok 'n' Roll!

.

Tags:

Throwing my hat into the ring!
Dark
[info]oldhorseman

                         


   Okay...  Back in '08 I warned the lot o' ya' that The Great Messiah Obama was just another goddamned politician, but you wouldn't listen. 

   At the moment, according to the polls, folks have actually wised-up and realized that ol' Barry ain't gonna manage to fix everything with a great speech...  And that the Republicans who are running to replace him probably won't be any better.  Of course, as the election season gets going, the tribalism and team spirit bullshit will kick-in and give everyone a terminal case of stupid.


   I just don't know if I can tolerate another round of "MOST IMPORTANT DECISION EVER" nonsense as you idiots get all wound-up over which of the interchangeable goddamned politicians gets to play front-man for the next term.  So I'll give you a more interesting option.

   Elect ME to be your next President.

   Seriously.  Don't be fooled by that "Change You Can Believe In" stuff.  I'll give you Changes You Won't Freakin' Believe! 


The Economy...

   First off, I'll order the IRS to stop prosecuting anyone and everyone for failure to pay income taxes.  You think taxes are a good idea, and want to "pay your share"?  Feel free to do so.  Otherwise, do whatever you want with what you've got.  I think you'll put it to better use than the politicians and bureaucrats would anyway.

   "NO!" I'm sure you class-warfare indoctrinated Liberals will scream. "That will just benefit the rich and screw the low income folks!"  No problem... Got a solution for that too...

   I will order the Treasury to cut every US Citizen a payment for One Million Dollars.

   Where do we get the money?  We print it.  We're the Government.  We can do that.  As many trillion dollar bills as it takes.  That's how a fiat currency 'works'.  It's money because we SAY it is.

   What about the Federal Reserve?  FUCK THE FEDERAL RESERVE.  We'll print up as enough trillion dollar bills to pay-off the "national debt", and if whomever is the Federal Reserve Chairman at that time wants to bitch about it, I'll send some US Marines over to his office to shoot him until he shuts the hell up.

   "Won't all this printing wreck the value of the dollar?" someone with an IQ above room temperature might ask...  Yes.  It absolutely, totally will.  But not before you've all had a chance to discharge your fixed dollar debts.  Student loans, mortgages, etc.  POOF! Gone.  You'll start fresh, and have to devise an economy with new mediums of exchange.  Maybe this time you'll have the sense to keep politicians out of it so they can't sell you right back into currency debt slavery.




Foreign Relations...

   All these wars all over the place sure don't seem to be accomplishing much good.  A lot of resources flushed.  A lot of boys killed, maimed, or rendered psychotic.  Screw it.  I'll bring all the troops home so they can get-in on the Million Dollar apiece spending spree.

   As for national defense, I'm gonna take a page out of Frank J's playbook and Nuke the Moon...  Because... Hell... Just look at it up there.  Perfect place for alien invaders, terrorists, commies, or whatever to lay in wait.  Watching for a chance to pounce on us!  A few mushroom clouds scattered across ol' Luna's surface at random intervals oughtta' shake 'em up!


   Besides, the American people have spent a damned fortune building and maintaining the coolest nuclear arsenal in the Solar System, it'd be downright wasteful not to nuke SOMETHING.

   (And it'd probably have the side-effect of proving to the world that America truly is way too stark, slavering buggo to ever mess with again!)

   Possible follow-up... Nuke Mecca.  As an act of kindness to release a billion people from the grip of a crushingly retarded superstition.  Vatican may want to stay good and quiet, lest I get on a roll.



Scandals...

   One thing none of us probably expected when Barry was elected...  The dude has been insufferably BORING.  Same-old, same-old Big Government healthcare and "job bill" legislative agendas.  Not that Dubya was any better, with "controversy" over crap that went-down decades earlier, or whether or not he really believed Saddam had WMDs...  YAWN!!!!

   At least Slick Willy knew how to achieve some entertainment value.  Murder mysteries, bimbo eruptions, wrapped in Eddie Haskel sleaze. 

   Elect me President, and I promise to do WAY better than this...

   Seriously.  I won't waste the power and influence of the office on plump interns.  Expect tales of (and images) of monumentally hot babes, heavy-duty kink, demonic rituals, full-on orgies, and inconvenient witnesses having all kinds of convenient mishaps.  Right up to and including my impeachment.


Old Horseman
for
President.

Why settle for the lesser of two evils,
when you can elect a straight-up
Glorious Bastard?

.


Nine-eleven-eleven...
Dark
[info]oldhorseman

   Yes, it's been a while.  I haven't abandoned the world of Doom...  It's just been a helluva Summer, and I'm still neck-deep in projects and dealing with distractions in meatspace.  But I couldn't let the tenth anniversary of 9-11 pass without at least a brief comment.

   A decade after the Pentagon smoked and the twin towers fell, as we look back on that shocking day and all the days that followed, one thing is certain...

   The terrorists totally won.

   And I'm not talking about just the rag-head moon-worshipers either.

   Never mind whether the attacks were totally the work of "Muslim Extremists", or covert players in America let it happen on purpose, or actually masterminded the whole thing themselves.  Whether the WTC towers came down because some fanatics flew hijacked planes into them, controlled demolition charges were fired, or some scheme using holograms, death rays, and alien tech reverse-engineered at Area 51 was carried-out.

   What really matters is that the terror of 9-11 has been successfully exploited to destroy American freedom.  Not by Osama bin Whatzits, but by our professional, domestic terrorists.

   Want to travel across the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave?  Well, you'd best be willing to suffer indignities and humiliations on-par with those experienced by felons in maximum security prisons.  You know... To prevent another 9-11.

   Want to keep your personal business private?  Forget it!  Government has to have access to everything everyone does... You know... To make it possible to track "terrorist" activities.

   Not crazy about paying taxes to fund endless wars, making life for people already unfortunate enough to live in the ass-backwards Muslim world even worse?  Hey! Support our troops, you
ungrateful bastard!  They're over there fighting for our freedoms...  Well... Y'know... The freedom to pay taxes and be strip-searched and have everything we do meddled-with...  But, somehow, having American armed thugs pushing people around in their own countries is supposed to make the Muslim World less inclined to want to lash-out at America.

   Back at home, where the Boys in Blue have long-since transformed into black-clad, assault-rifle wielding Rambo wannabes, electrocuting or chemically blinding children and little old ladies for "failure to comply", we're still expected to treat them as "heroes" because a few of them actually died honorably on 9-11.

   The terrorists won.  The flags and "patriotic" displays, the praising of the "heroes", and the reverent services are all, in actuality, a celebration of their victory.

.



Quick check-in...
Dark
[info]oldhorseman
.

    I have been, and will for some months continue to be, busy with working the doomstead, and writing stuff that I actually get paid-for...  Trying to bring in a few Federal Reserve Notes and get them spent on useful things before the wheels come-off next year and everyone realizes how worthless silly green paper is!

   I'll still be reading friends posts, checking for replies to my old postings, and so-forth during my long breaks from posting here though.

   Another reminder for fans of the old LATOC Forum...  We're still going over at The Oil Age.  Basically the same kinda' stuff, just on a forum & server that actually function reliably. 


.


FedEx Sucks!
Dark
[info]oldhorseman





Yeah, their half-ass approach to doing business just cost me a good chunk of change and flushed a lot of time and effort down the tubes.

So I'm making it my new hobby to do what I can to make them NOT the world's #1 shipping corporation and Internet default option for too much longer.

Remember when Blockbuster was the 900# gorilla of home video? The treated everyone like crap until NetFlix came along with decent service and buried their ass. Well, it's time for us all to look around for and support the NetFlix of parcel delivery!

In the mean time, I started a new website at
FedExSucks.biz

Check it out. No ads. Nothing for sale there.
The ".biz" is because FedEx, aware of their own sucktitude, preemptively bought the .com, .net, .org versions, etc.

I'd appreciate it if y'all could pass the link around. Put it on your blogs and FaceBooks.

Thanks...

.

Government Indoctrination Centers. AKA Public Schools...
Dark
[info]oldhorseman


            






     Okay, this has come up a couple of times in the last month on FaceBook, so I'll post about it at length here where we don't have to type in one endless paragraph!

     There is an interesting aspect to society... Once a thing has been around for two generations (sometimes less), it becomes almost impossible for most people to imagine that there was ever a time when we got along pretty well without that thing. Either folks try to retcon history to pretend the thing always existed (kinda' like the Flintstones' world), or they believe that life must have been really awful before the thing in question was invented.

     Trick is that it doesn't matter whether the thing was actually beneficial or not. It only has to be treated as beneficial, and stay around long enough for people to forget what it was really like before the thing came along. Then the public will be fully convinced that the thing is ESSENTIAL, even if it does exactly the opposite of what it was supposed to accomplish.

     The Government Indoctrination System, deceptively called the "Public Schools", may well be one of the most destructive things ever to be inflicted on America.



     Public Schools were founded on the claim that a democratically representative nation must have an electorate sufficiently educated to read-up on the candidates and issues before voting... And the myth that this could only be accomplished by Government-run education for the masses. (Notice the inherent conflict of interests in the people running the Government getting to "educate" the voters?)

     Now, the notion that it takes 12 (later 14) years to teach a kid to read, write, do math, and access research materials (even back when that meant a card catalog rather than Google) was ridiculous on its face. Even more insane is the idea that learning, which happens as a natural process distinct to each individual human being, could be standardized and effectively administered on some kind of assembly-line. The primary goal of the system was never to produce literate, creative thinkers, but reliable workers and soldiers. Cogs for the machine. But the laudable SUPPOSED goals of the program quickly made Public Education a sacred cow to Americans. Even more so as the myth was fostered that, prior to modern, institutionalized Public Schools, most Americans were drooling illiterates.

     Contrary to what you may see in Hollywood Westerns, Americans were quite a literate people prior to the establishment of Prussian model Public Schools. Visitors from England and Europe, like Alexis de Tocqueville, commented that the average, working-class American was substantially more educated and well-read than his Old World counterpart. If you ever read some of the best-selling novels from the 19th Century, you may be astonished at the complexity of the language and ideas conveyed within. Letters of the period, not from privileged officers and gentry, but written by grunt soldiers, dirt farmers, and liverymen as well as their wives, girlfriends, and mothers are often poetic in their elegance.

     Press, Politics and the Public Sphere in Europe and North America 1760-1820 (2002) confirms that literacy was already high, over 90% in some regions, by 1800. So, at the very least, Public Schools were (ostensibly) created to solve a problem that didn't exist.



“Looking back, abundant data exist from states like Connecticut and Massachusetts to show that by 1840 the incidence of complex literacy in the United States was between 93 and 100 percent wherever such a thing mattered. According to the Connecticut census of 1840, only one citizen out of every 579 was illiterate, and you probably don’t want to know, not really, what people in those days considered literate; it’s too embarrassing.

“Popular novels of the period give a clue: Cooper’s Last of the Mohicans, published in 1826, sold so well that a contemporary equivalent would have to move 10 million copies to match it. If you pick up an uncut version, you find your self in a dense thicket of philosophy, history, culture, manners, politics, geography, astute analysis of human motives and actions, all conveyed in data-rich periodic sentences so formidable that only a determined and well-educated reader can handle it nowadays. …

“By 1940, the literacy figure for all states stood at 96 percent for whites, 80 percent for blacks. Notice for all the disadvantages blacks labored under, four of five were still literate. Six decades later, at the end of the twentieth century, the National Adult Literacy Survey and the National Assessment of Educational Progress say 40 percent blacks and 17 percent of whites can’t read at all. Put another way, black illiteracy doubled, and white illiteracy quadrupled."


-John Taylor Gatto (NYC Teacher of the Year 1989, '90, '91. NYS TotY 1991.)



     So Public Schools patently fail at their supposed objective of producing educated citizens. But that's okay with the people in-charge, because education was never the real point anyway.

     It's pretty obvious if you're not already blinded by the system. You don't teach human beings to think by training them to respond to bells, marching from class-to-class to perform uniformly assigned tasks, forcing them into artificially contrived groups to obey arbitrary rules. In fact, that sort of thing is specifically designed to dehumanize and condition "students" NOT to think.

     The staunchest advocates of Public Education started really showing their hands when the Home Schooling movement came along. Initially they claimed there was no way ordinary parents could effectively replace the dozens of professionally-trained, certified, Government-approved educators each kid is subjected-to. They predicted the home-schooled youngsters would fall hopelessly behind... Until the Home School students started outperforming Public School students academically, scoring in the 86th percentile on standardized tests, even in States with relatively little Government oversight of Home Schooling.

     So then the truth came out, as Home Schooling was attacked for denying kids opportunities for "socialization". That's right. It's not "education" we're submitting America's children to Government-run institutions for. It's social indoctrination. Orwell was an optimist.


“A primary purpose of the educational system is to train school children in good citizenship, patriotism and loyalty to the state and the nation as a means of protecting the public welfare.”

- Judge H. Walter Croskey, California’s Second District Court of Appeal


I kid you not... This is what came up when I Googled Croskey.



     A FaceBook friend of mine, defending Public Schools and the teachers therein, posted:

"There are many education options. I've never heard a teacher tell anyone that a private school or home schooling was a less viable option than public school. I've never heard a government official say that either.... so not so much indoctrinating our youth about that as you're just making stuff up."


     Sadly, I am not "just making stuff up"... First off, the option of Home or Private Schooling is severely restricted by the fact that the Government, relying largely on funding the Public School system as an excuse, essentially taxes many parents to the point that they cannot afford these options. (And just listen to the Public School officials and Teacher's Unions SCREAM if anyone suggests letting parents choose to keep some of their own money for non-Public educational options!)

     Second, Private Schools, and Home Schooling are subject to various levels of Government control. That's sort of like claiming to have Freedom of the Press, but having to submit every publication to a Government editor.

     As for "no government official saying that home schooling is a less viable option than public school", well...

     California’s Second District Court of Appeal on Feb. 28, 2008 declared the parents of most of that state’s 166,000 home-schooled children to be outlaws, ruling California law requires parents to send their children to full-time state-certified public or private schools or else have them taught at home by “credentialed” tutors — which most home-school parents, presumably, aren’t.

     “California courts have held that … parents do not have a constitutional right to homeschool their children,” Justice H. Walter Croskey said in the 3-0 ruling.


     Referring back to J.T. Gatto...

“Our form of compulsory schooling is an invention of the state of Massachusetts, from around 1850. It was resisted — sometimes with guns — by an estimated 80 percent of the Massachusetts population, with the last outpost, in Barnstable on Cape Cod, not surrendering its children until the 1880s, when the area was seized by the militia and the children marched to school under guard.

“Schools were designed by Horace Mann and Barnas Sears and W.R. Harper of the University of Chicago and Edward Thorndike of Columbia Teachers College and other to be instruments for the scientific management of a mass population. Schools are intended to produce, through the application of formulas, formulaic human beings whose behavior can be predicted and controlled."



     So this is why I refer to Public Education as Government Indoctrination Centers. They are not for the public, and are not really for the purpose of education. They exist for the benefit of the Government and the continuation of its power by indoctrination of America's youth.

     But it's actually far worse that that. Consider what Public Schools are actually teaching kids... I don't mean what's in the textbooks and lesson-plans (although some of that is bad enough). I mean the general conditioning to accept arbitrary authority and the fact that all rules, while treated almost as holy scripture, can be ignored at will by anyone in power. For instance, the Bill of Rights is much discussed in class, but then students are routinely subjected to unwarranted searches, questioning without council, denial of due process, forced self-incrimination, and other clear civil rights violations with impunity by the Government agents staffing the Public School.

     Then there's the whole "anti-bullying" nonsense... I'll let Stef explain that point, as he's already done it so well.





     Because generations of Americans have been conditioned to believe that the Public Schools are essential to the welfare of the children and the future of our country, anyone opposing funding for the system is seen as some kind of heartless monster. Thus the system has grown to vacuum in massive amounts of wealth in taxes. $12,000 to $27,000 per student, per year, according to the CATO Institute.

     This means that, with both parents working to shoulder the tax burden, there's nobody home to raise the kids, far less to educate them. And paying for Private School is pretty much out of the question. So most kids are doomed to be raised by the Government Indoctrination Centers (and television), with their nominal parents having horrifyingly little real input.

     And that's if they're lucky enough to have two parents. With both parents both working (mostly to pay taxes in one form or another), and struggling to find the time and energy to at least try to be Mothers and Fathers now and then, it's no surprise that they have nothing left-over to invest into their roles as Wives and Husbands... Marriages fall-apart and the kids are left in even worse shape with a broken home.

     Of course, the collapse of the family only justifies MORE expansion of the Public School system. After-school and weekend programs, year-round classes, etc. to help keep the single parent home kids from the various troubles to which they are statistically prone. Justifying increased budgets, thus more taxes, stressing more families to the breaking point in the process.

     Then there is what I think may be the saddest aspect of all... Parents so indoctrinated into the myth of Public Education that they say things like "Grades are the number one priority!" So many kids out there... Basically good kids. Not troublemakers, junkies, thieves or whatever... Perfectly capable of reading, writing, ciphering... Constantly being punished by their parent(s) because they don't conform well to the Indoctrination Center agenda. Spending their formative years in a perpetual state of mutual anger with their Mom and/or Dad, missing-out on so many of the life-building experiences of youth due to some civil servant giving them bad grades because they wouldn't break-down and just do the idiotic busy-work assignments. Each generation conditioned to assist in breaking the will of the next.

     So we have Public Education, a disease masquerading as it's own cure... With the side-effect of producing sheeple who will quietly tolerate having 3/4 to 7/8 of their wealth stolen from them, accept the neo-Gestapo as "heroes", let themselves be irradiated and/or groped by unappealing strangers with badges for no rational reason, and submit their own offspring for indoctrination.

     The collapse of Public Education is one of TEOTWAWKI's brightest silver linings.
















Prepping for Three Futures...
Dark
[info]oldhorseman


            






     Thing about TEOTWAWKI... We can't quite be sure of the whens and hows of the collapse. While I'm still figuring on the post-'12 world being ruled by damned, dirty apes, it's possible things could move either faster or slower... That the downward slide could continue for years to come, or abruptly go over the cliff into free-fall. It's even possible that a few "lucky" breaks and a lot of smoke blown up the public's collective backside could create another "recovery" before the final crash.

     So I try to make my doom preps and plans in such a way that they'll work in any of three scenarios. For instance, right now I'm making use of the Cornucopian resources that allow me to have my best draft mare bred to a high-quality out-of-state stud via AI with shipped, chilled semen in hopes of producing a good colt to raise as my new farm stallion. (Old LATOC Forum regulars may recall that my old stallion passed-on a while back.)

     If all goes well (and no one knows better than I how the best laid schemes gang aft agley!), 2015 will find me with a very large, highly trained, pedigreed Belgian stallion of unusual quality for this region...

     In the scenario I consider most likely, we'll be settling into full-on LATOC, with the countryside largely abandoned. Those who hang-on out here without reliable grid and access to affordable fuel will naturally revert to pre-petro means of farming and transport, but will be somewhat handicapped by the re-purposed sport and pleasure horses they'll be trying to get honest work out of. The option of importing good work horses from up in Amish country will be gone, so the only way to get decent work stock will be to breed such animals locally... So the breeding services of a big, strong draft stud will probably be a valuable trade commodity.




     Or we can imagine that next year the American people "will wise-up and put Sarah Palin in office so she can straighten-out them damned camel-jockeys, tap all them zillions of gallons of oil under the Rockies, and give us a new Economic Boom!"

     In periods of economic growth, the money in the horse business comes from the spoilt daughters and trophy wives of successful businessmen living out their International Velvet dreams... An impressive Belgian stallion can be promoted as a Sporthorse sire catering to thoroughbred mares. I can set him up with a slick website and offer services AI.



     Finally, there's the possibility that the current sickly economy will drag-on into something like a permanent version of the 1970s... Oddly enough, the 1970s was actually a period of horse-world growth in America. (The socio-economic nature of that era's horse industry deserves an article of its own!) There were a lot of people getting into horses back then, and most of them barely knew a forelock from a fetlock. Couldn't impress them with quality horseflesh, as they'd actually have to know something about horses for that. Couldn't impress them with athletic capability, as they couldn't ride well enough to test the limits of a geriatric plug-horse...

     But you could impress them with SIZE. The late '70s saw great breeds nearly ruined as idiots bred for height at the expense of all else. Quarterhorses, appaloosas, and other horses traditionally under 15 hands tall were suddenly expected to be over 16 hands. They also went from being traditionally sound to being infamously susceptible to lameness.



     Well, if we get another era of dime-store cowboys who wanna play "mine's bigger", I'll have a way to accommodate them without contributing to the demise of great breeds, with a stallion of a type that is SUPPOSED to be freakin' gigantic.



     Equestrian specific examples aside, my point is that you don't have to worry about having "wasted" your time and resources prepping if the crash doesn't come on schedule. You can plan your preps in ways that will benefit you Doom, Boom, or anywhere in-between.
















Television: Final Honeymoon Finally Starting!
Dark
[info]oldhorseman


            






     Back in April of '08, I admitted that even I can't stay focused on the oncoming DOOM and reverting to c. 1900 tech all the time. Although I ditched DirecTV "cable" programming long ago, I still indulge in a little OTA television. So I was getting ready for the transition from NTSC analog TV to ATSC digital with set-top converter boxes and antenna upgrades.

     In May of that year I reflected on how each new venue for TV transmission had opened the way for a (sometimes brief) era of unusual and cool programming, and hoped the new digital sub-channels would give us one last honeymoon with TV before TEOTWAWKI...

     Well, the digital transition came in 2009. And my predicted rebirth of low-budget, innovative, local TV on the new sub-channels was nowhere to be seen. In fact, it appeared that the people running the TV stations were basically morons. Unable to even program their EPGs correctly!

     Several stations used their x.2 stations for a Standard Definition mirror of their High Definition x.1 programming. Which was just plain dumb, as anyone with digital TV, including an old analog set with converter, can watch the HD channel just fine in SD on x.1.

     One Fox affiliate filled its x.2 with a HD mirror of x.1, but running the Secondary Audio Program. This is idiotic, as 90% of the time, there is no SAP. And when there is, you can listen to it on x.1 just by tapping the "audio/SAP" button on your remote!

     Then there were 24/7 Weather & Info sub-channels. Not really a bad idea, but we don't need five of them in the same market!

     Finally, over a year and a half after the digital switch, TV stations are beginning to find something interesting to do with their sub-channels. Much of the stuff I was hoping-for is indeed making a comeback, just from a different source than I'd expected.

     A number of "sub-networks" have emerged, making their feeds available to stations across the country. Some of these are themed channels, like the Live Well Network (oddly-enough, carried as the x.2 of our NBC affiliate, despite LWN being ABC-owned), TCN (country music videos), Video Mix TV (what it says on the tin), and a Spanish-language channel (Reconquista anyone?).

     But the coolest trend may be the new sub-channel networks popping-up to get mileage out of the underused studio archives. Classic TV and movies that haven't seen much air since goddamned infomercials gobbled-up all the out-of-the-way timeslots they used to occupy on broadcast TV, and all the basic cable channels wound up being absorbed into mega-media corporations, giving them access to the recent shows that the bean-counters mistakenly think are better programming.

     First our CBS affiliate replaced its SD mirror on x.2 with thisTV which features mostly MGM/UA/Orion movies, along with some old TV shows. Sadly, the MGM cartoon archives were bought by Turner long ago, so they're absent. But the DePatie-Freleng cartoons (Pink Panther, Inspector, Ant & Aardvark, Roland & Ratfink, even Misterjaw) are seen both as scheduled programming and as filler when movies run short.

     Then one of our Fox affiliates added an x.2 to run AntennaTV which runs all kinds of TV shows from the '50s through the '80s, plus some movies, the lesser-known archives of UPA/Screen Gems cartoons, and... oh yeah THE THREE STOOGES!





     Our stronger Fox affiliate is advertising an impending switch of their x.3 channel to MEtv, which is sort of a sister-network to thisTV, but with the reverse ratio of old TV shows (heavy on Westerns and detective shows) to movies.

     Seriously... The classic TV opening themes on the MEtv front page deliver more entertainment value than entire seasons of many modern shows!

     Even the local TCT (Total Christian Television) station has added an x.3 channel filled-out with ancient shows like Ozzie & Harriet, The Beverly Hillbillies, and the Roy Rogers Show. Hallelujah!

     All it takes for us to get all these FREE digital TV channels, even out here in the boonies, is my home-made mast antenna and a $15 pre-amp booster.



     Throw in streaming video from the Internet and a couple of NetFlix DVDs each week, and we've got way more stuff than anyone needs to watch! Why on Earth does anyone pay for cable or satellite anymore?















Tags:

Wisdom of Our Elders vs Being Too Clever By Half...
Dark
[info]oldhorseman


            






     It's pretty clear to most on the LATOC Forum that the Cornucopian paradigm is failing. Those of us determined to avoid being subject to the shrinking, yet intensifying Welfare/Police State realize that we're going to have to adopt a simpler, perhaps more primitive way of life that does not depend upon GovCo infrastructure.

     Some envision a return to the Dark Ages... Perhaps even the Stone Ages. And that might be inevitable if the collapse were to happen overnight and without warning. But this is not the case. We've been warned, and things are unraveling over time. So we should be able to take steps to do better.

     Living without petroleum-enabled, Cornucopian resources isn't really uncharted territory. In fact, it was the norm right up until a handful of generations ago. After millennia of experience, our grandparents (add as many "greats" as is appropriate for your generation) had worked out a pretty decent way of life by the dawn of the 20th Century.

     We've learned some new things since their time. And that will surely come in-handy, as we will have to get-by without the 19th Century infrastructure they had backing them up. But they also had an expression about being "too clever by half", which described people who were likely to fail with new and complex solutions to problems that could easily be solved with tried-and-true approaches. Many people today, including some on the LATOC Forum, tend to be too clever by half when they could benefit from the wisdom of our elders instead.


Transportation and Farm Traction.


     When it comes to independent transportation, the too clever by half ideas include electric cars and scooters, hybrid electric cars, solar-powered cars, and "devout" walking. For farm traction, a lot of folks love to propose oxen or more unorthodox animal power, some kind of electric or biofuel tractor, or relying strictly on hand tools.

     The problem with the electric, solar, hybrid, biofuel, and other modern machinery is that what is available now is scarcely more infrastructure-independent than its petroleum powered equivalents, and tends to be cost-prohibitive. Waiting around for these techno-fixes to evolve and become affordable doesn't get you an inch closer to being LATOC-ready today. Oxen, yaks, buffalo, reindeer, llamas, and other critters have indeed been used successfully as beasts of burden. But there's good reason you didn't see many of them in-use in America by the late 19th Century. And good luck finding well-broke working teams of any of these, or anyone who knows how to produce them. As for relying entirely on your own two feet for transportation, and human labor for farm work, that's just voluntarily regressing to the Neolithic when we could easily do so much better.



     At the end of the 19th Century, there was a fabulous revolution in human transportation. The practical bicycle! Before it was relegated to use by children and recreational enthusiasts by the advent of the automobile, the bike was a means of serious, everyday mobility for many Americans. In some parts of the world it remained a primary mode of transport right through the 20th Century... The things still work just fine today, and you can go buy a serviceable, new one that will last for decades of sensible use for an affordable price at a store near you tomorrow! A small closet full of spare parts and tools could keep you wheeling for the rest of your days.

     For heavier transportation and farm traction, there are horses or mules. Faster and more versatile than other beasts, the development of the collar and hames type harness, which allowed them to work up to their full potential, had an enormous impact on the history of Western Civilization. Like the bicycle, equines were mostly relegated to sport and recreational use by the rise of the automobile. But there are still millions of horses to be found all over America.

     Unfortunately, the vast majority of these modern equines are used for riding only. While riding has its uses, you can get a lot more practical work out of horses in harness. But it may take some effort to find fully-trained harness teams and competent horsemen who can show you how to hitch and drive.



     Opportunities to learn basic horsemanship are pretty easy to come by. There are many stables that offer riding lessons which will at least show you how to handle and move around horses safely. Competent instruction in hitching and driving is harder to find. A good place to start may be your local Thresher's Reunion or draft horse auction. (Rural Heritage keeps a calendar of draft auctions and events at http://www.ruralheritage.com/calendar/index.htm) Another handy resource is the Small Farmer's Journal.


Seen at our Thresher's Reunion.
(Click for video.)


     Keep in-mind that you don't have to start out with giant draft horses and a full outfit. You can get a lot of work out of common horses and ponies. I did a series of articles on getting started with driving on the cheap a while back which you may find handy.


Vegetable Farming.


     I've personally sworn off ever reading the LATOC Forum's Food Production and Gardening Section due to the fact that the bulk of the concepts posted are too clever by half. Hydroponics, "no-till", square foot, lasagna, mulch/ ground cover, straw bale, exotic crops, "permaculture", etc., etc... It's not that these approaches and techniques don't work. It's that most of them either require Cornucopian inputs, can't be effectively scaled-up to meaningful production, have serious drawbacks, or were accomplished by previous generations without so much fuss.

     Farmers have been identified with plowing for millennia for good reason. Tilling and cultivating the ground works. Food crops are only as good as the soil they're grown in. You don't get healthy minerals from straw bales or shredded newspapers. And you can't keep the weeds from taking over a garden big enough to actually feed anybody by hand. (Most people grossly underestimate the volume of vegetables it actually takes to support a low meat/dairy diet, and claims about "feeding the family" from a little backyard plot conveniently ignore the calorie-intense flour, corn, sugar, and whatnot they bring-in from elsewhere.) "No-till" is actually the way modern industrial farming is done, relying on chemical fertilizer/herbicide/pesticide programs designed to grow big, pretty vegetables (which tend to be deficient in nutrients and taste compared to those grown in healthy soil).

     Gardening is a good way to learn how to grow things. But the doomer gardener should always be thinking in terms of how they could make their garden grow without Cornucopian inputs, and how they could scale-up to produce a meaningful amount of food.

     Pre-Cornucopian farming was not just acres and acres of row crops. It was an integrated system of woodlands, orchards, pastures, and more that provided labor, fertilizer, fuels, and most of what was needed to support the operation. If all you've got is a veggie patch, you're not going to make it unless you are part of a community can provide the many things you lack.

     Our grandparents had most of this worked-out. The aforementioned animal traction to till the soil and pull cultivators through the rows to keep the weeds in check, as well as to provide fertilizer and work it into the dirt. Plain old outhouses had the "humanure" thing going-on without the expense of modern composting toilet systems. If you're just trying to feed yourself, some of the less glamorous staples like potatoes, corn, beans, and tomatoes should be a focus. Unless you can sell the surplus, a lot of the other veggies were limited to grandma's kitchen garden because, even if you could grow enough of them to be a significant part of the household diet, they wouldn't keep long enough to be more than a seasonal treat without energy-intensive storage.


Livestock.


     Meat, dairy, and egg production is another realm in which some people seem intent upon "thinking outside the box" before they even look into the box to find the perfectly good solutions within. Sometimes it's vegans with their quasi-religious dedication to the false notion that an animal-source free diet is sustainable and LATOC-efficient. (I've been on a vegetable-intensive diet for a few months now, and that means bringing in a ridiculous amount of very perishable stuff that could not possibly be supplied by any garden. So I know better!) More often it's a fascination with unorthodox, exotic, rare, or re-purposed stock. Animals which are hard to find and expensive. That your local vets and other care professionals are likely to be unfamiliar with. That may not do quite so well in a domestic farming situation as you imagine.

     Plain old dairy cows, especially the Jersey, produce healthy, high-butter milk as well now as they did a century ago. If Bossie is too much for you, a common nanny goat or two will fill the bill (although the milk is a little trickier to handle). Ordinary chickens are hard to equal as a practical source of eggs and occasional meat. And the hog was recycling all sorts of stuff into useful pork and lard for homesteads long before recycling became "a thing".

     Chickens are probably the best place to start for someone with no livestock experience. They're cheap, and a hen-house, coop and tractor aren't that difficult to build. Looking after them isn't exactly rocket science. That's why pretty much every country house had chickens all over the place back in the day. There are plenty of folks around who can show you how to humanely kill, pluck, and butcher the excess birds. You can even find demos on the Internet.



     Hogs are also pretty simple to deal-with and can withstand inexperienced management with few ill effects. Especially if you start out with feeder pigs. You just put 'em in a pen with some shade, keep 'em supplied with water, and provide them with a slop of whatever you have too much of. Produce, eggs, dairy, acorns, etc. They're omnivores with digestive tracts almost as tough as humans. It's best not to interact with them too much because they are the most dangerous animals on the farm, and because... Well... You're going to be cutting them up for bacon, so you don't need to get attached. Before embarking on raising hogs or other large meat animals, you might want to go on some deer hunting trips and learn from experienced hunters how to dress a carcass. Or get someone with that kind of experience to come help you dispatch and butcher your first hogs.



     Dairy animals require more knowledge and skill for proper upkeep, as they have longer productive life-spans and need to be handled on a daily basis. But cows and goats were commonplace on homesteads of yore, and caring for them is not as daunting as you might think. A bit of grass. (Dairy cows and goats are pretty adept at grazing tethered, so you don't even need good fences everywhere.) A shed where they get in out of the weather. Common feed supplements. There are lots of good books on home dairy production. And Internet resources.


Home Heating.


     There are several trendy alternative home heating approaches among doomers. Geothermal loops, masonry/soapstone stoves, pellet stoves, solar radiator systems, and others. All of which tend to be pricey, both in terms of purchase and installation. Some also have little-publicized drawbacks. Rooftop solar collectors ineffective when covered in snow, when you need them most. Circulation systems dependent upon grid power. Stoves that take a long time to start putting out heat, then keep heating your home through the day when it's already plenty warm enough.

     Two of the most common approaches to home heating back before the grid were in basic design (what we now call "passive solar") and good old cast-iron wood stoves. The former was just a matter of letting the sun do its thing. The latter was far more efficient, and easier to install, than a stone or brick fireplace, and could turn a relatively small pile of wood into a very controllable amount of heat which could be started and stopped in fairly short order as needed.

     Natural passive solar can be achieved to a substantial degree simply by surrounding one's home with deciduous trees rather than evergreens. Yes, they look rough during the winter, but they let the sun's warming rays through to your roof, walls, and windows. You can even get double service out of the seasonal shade by planting fruit trees. Just opening your curtains and blinds during bright day for a bit of greenhouse effect (especially if you have double-layers of glass), then closing them to hold in the heat at night can do wonders in temperate regions.



     People really do make a mountain out of a mole-hill when it comes to wood stoves. But you can get perfectly serviceable stoves dirt cheap if you look around, and everything you need to install them is at Home Depot or Lowes. It's just a cast-iron box full of fire with air-intake vents in the front and a exhaust pipe coming out the top. You put heat proof floor tiles under it (and where embers may fall out when you're tending the thing), situate the stove and pipes where they won't be too close to anything flammable like unshielded walls. A simple damper in the pipe from the stove. Heat-proof accommodation for where the pipe passes through the wall. A strong-supported smokestack that extends well above your roof, and is capped and screened to keep rain and birds out. Heck, just try to find an old country store or someplace where they've been using a wood stove successfully since before we started letting bureaucrats and lawyers design everything and see how they did it. It really isn't brain surgery.


Water.


     One essential aspect of living in which we sadly cannot emulate our pre-Cornucopian forefathers is the acquisition of safe water. They relied heavily upon surface sources. Creeks, ponds, rain catchment, springs, and shallow wells. Sprawling development, factories, mining/drilling, and industrial agriculture have rendered such sources unreliable and polluted. So we're forced to depend more upon deep wells.

     Retrieving water from deep below the ground is a challenge that some propose to meet with some pretty clever approaches. Windmills and direct PV solar DC submerged pumps filling above-ground tanks for gravity-pressure running water are great alternatives to grid-dependent pumping... At least in theory. But both are quite expensive to install and can be difficult to maintain.

     Early in the Cornucopian era, our grandparents figured out what has become the standard for rural, deep-well water supplies. A high voltage, AC, submerged pump feeding into a fairly small pressure tank, then out to the taps. Because such current feeds well over long wires, the electric conduit need not be over-sized. This type of pump can bring up water at high volume and pressure, so there is no need for a large storage tank, and the water can be left safely underground until it is needed. The pressure tank can push water out through the pipes whenever taps are opened, with the pump only running intermittently to charge the tank pressure back up when it drops below a set PSI. Thus the pump typically runs only a few dozen minutes per day... This kind of deep well pump set-up is compact. (Usually about the size of a dog house.) It's relatively inexpensive. And it's pretty-much "install and forget", as the components can last decades with little or no maintenance. If such systems didn't rely upon the grid for power, they'd be doomerrific.


Click for Solar Well Pump Conversion Thread.


     Unless you're building your doomstead from scratch, you'll probably find an AC submerged pump and pressure tank set-up already in-place. For a few thousand dollars, you can install alternative energy collection (a couple of solar panels and maybe a small wind turbine), a controller, a few deep-cycle batteries, and an inverter to create a free-standing power station to run the established well pump system off-grid. It'd be wise to have some spare parts (especially for the inverter), and to learn how to recondition the batteries. But the whole thing will cost substantially less than a DC-direct pump system (which requires several times the solar panels and/or wind turbine wattage), needs no water tower, or major construction (as is needed to support a deep well windmill pump). And the parts that will need maintenance aren't going to be way up on a tower, or have to be fished-up from hundreds of feet down.


Critical Existence Fail.


     There's a lot to be said for unorthodox approaches and innovation. If doomers had the time and money to invest, we could no-doubt apply many of the breakthroughs and developments of recent years and create doomsteads and LATOC communities that would enable a post-crash way of life substantially easier and more modern than one based on pre-Cornucopian technologies.

     But most of us don't have tons of money laying-around. And none of us have a lot of time left to work with. The difference between my plow horse and many other doomers' home biofuel production and farm equipment is that I actually have the plow horse, while their system exists only as a plan, waiting for the resources to build it to materialize... A cow or goat in the yard will produce a lot more milk than the yak or exotic breed animal you were planning to get before the crash hit home and you lost your chance... When fuel distribution fails, the bicycle in your closet will be a whole lot more useful than the high-tech, solar-charged, lithium-ion car you didn't quite save up the money to buy.


Not pictured: The vast fleet of good bicycles you could have bought for the same price.


     At some point, the wheels are going to come completely off the economy. 9-11, Katrina, and the Gulf of Mexico demonstrated that we can't count on a lot of warning, and never know just where or how the crippling blow will strike. But when it does, only what you have actually done to prepare will count. Your doomer drawing board will be useful only for fuel... And even that only if you actually have a wood stove rather than a mere plan to get a soapstone stove somewhere down the line.
















You are viewing [info]oldhorseman's journal